4 reasons to buy the Nissan Micra. 1. Less fuel consumption (combined cycle) 0.8 l/km less. The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the exhaust emitted into the air. Economical cars are also more efficient to drive. 4.6 l/100 km / 51.1 mpg (USA) 5.4 l/100 km / 43.6 mpg (USA) 2. Shorter wheelbase.

A detailed comparison of Nissan Micra versus Suzuki Alto. On Car A Rac you will find out which car is better and what the car will suit you best. The greater the fuel tank capacity, the further the vehicle can travel without refueling. 41 L / 10.8 gallons 27 L / 7.1 gallons. Neutral comparisons between the Nissan Micra and Suzuki Alto. 1
It has a capacity of 41 liters (108 gal), a fuel tank capacity of 10.8 liters (108 gal), and a fuel consumption rating of 91.9 percent. Battery capacity (Ah): 472 raisettes. The best engine oil for Nissan Micra Active is 5W40 synthetic grade, but mineral engine oil is best for the first 10,000 kilometers.
Nissan Micra (1992 - 2003) - 93 998 Fuel problem. Engine will start .If I soak the air filter in petrol it starts but only for a few secs. One of the connections on the tank has power, one has not. The fuel pump fuse by the steering wheel is OK and has power on the test meter. Any more help please! Paul Reply | Report as offensive | Link
No frills, this car. One has to manually crank the windows open and closed. There are people who appreciate this kind of simplicity. Next, there's an SV trim, which adds to the basic car heated
Find all the key specs about the Nissan Micra Hatchback 1.2 Acenta (09/13-) 5d CVT from fuel efficiency and top speed, to running costs, dimensions data and lots more What are the dimensions of Micra Hatchback 2010 and its fuel capacity and the overall weight? Fuel Capacity: 41 litres: Weight: 1054kg: Length: 3825mm: Width: 1665mm . 92 413 389 62 241 250 115 278

nissan micra fuel tank capacity